Aerolab Field NotesIndustry notesNo. 003 · Sep 2026

Fintech design is mostly about removing doubt

Notes from a credit card issuer, four regional banks, a crypto platform, a payments app and an insurer.

Written by
Nicolas AndronowiczCOO, Aerolab
Published
Reading time
4 min read

The short version

  1. Speed builds trust in financial products. Naranja's new platform loaded three times faster and got 21% more visits on mobile.
  2. A design system with a CMS lets each business unit publish on its own. Grupo Petersen runs four banks on one.
  3. Design each flow for its moment of doubt, like a first crypto purchase at Ripio or a car claim at Sura.
  4. Set engineering guardrails at kickoff. Fpay held an 80% automated test coverage bar and shipped every week.

Nobody opens a banking app for fun. People open it to check something, pay something or fix something, and they usually arrive a little worried. Most of the work we've done in financial services comes back to that worry: find where it comes from, then design it out.

This note pulls together five projects: a credit card issuer, a group of regional banks, a crypto platform, a payments app and an insurer. Different products in different countries, and the same few lessons kept coming up.

Faster load times on Naranja's new platform
3x
Running on one design system at Grupo Petersen
4 banks
Automated test coverage bar on Fpay
80%

Speed reads as competence

Naranja is Argentina's largest credit card issuer. The numbers from its new platform are business numbers: 21% more visits on mobile, load times three times faster and an architecture about 60% smaller. Google featured the platform in its Mobile First report.

Grupo Petersen saw the same pattern. Server-side rendering and a round of optimization made loading and navigation up to 50% faster across its banks.

I don't think users file this under performance. A slow financial site feels like a site that might fail halfway through a payment, and people hesitate before they tap. A fast one feels like it knows what it's doing.

The design system is how the bank keeps shipping

Financial companies have many business units, and all of them want to publish. At Naranja we built a design system and brought in the Contentful CMS early, so each business unit could own its user-facing content. The component library was designed around the editorial workflow too: drafting, editing, proofreading and publishing.

The client's need for scalability and change-tolerance meant we needed to come up with solid, versatile components that make it straightforward to constantly add content and make adjustments.

Mariana Perez Villanueva, UX/UI designer at Aerolab, on Naranja

Grupo Petersen took the idea further: one design system and one CMS for four banks, Banco Santa Fe, Banco Entre Ríos, Banco San Juan and Banco Santa Cruz. The components had to cover every product and service the banks offer, and new landing pages had to be possible without technical knowledge. Nine people built it over eight months with Next.js, Storybook and Contentful.

In both cases the design system is what let the bank keep shipping after our team moved on.

Lower the intimidation

Ripio is one of the pioneers of crypto in Latin America. When we worked with them, crypto was far from mainstream and the learning curve was steep. Our discovery work concluded that Ripio needed to be more than a wallet. It needed to be a way into the crypto world.

I was the project manager on that one. We focused on onboarding and offboarding, so buying or selling crypto for the first time felt less intimidating and people could use new tools without being tech-savvy. We rebuilt the navigation and sitemap for people with and without an account, and improved the KYC flow together with the business requirements, which increased its conversion rate. A custom illustration and icon system made sure Ripio didn't look like every other exchange.

Sura, one of Latin America's largest insurers, is the same problem under more pressure. The flows that matter most get used on bad days: reporting a claim, or asking for help when your car breaks down. Clients had done this by phone for years. Our designers made the status of every process visible, used illustration to lower the effort of each step and explained technical insurance terms along the way. The more people could handle on their own, the less weight fell on customer service.

Trust needs engineering underneath

A payments app has very little room for error. Fpay's teams were spread across Argentina and Chile and split by layer, from backend to frontend. We defined the structure and requirements of the repository at kickoff, to avoid refactors later, and held an 80% automated test coverage bar from the start.

Backend and frontend development started at the same time, so the frontend team built mocked integrations from scratch to keep its work from stalling. A Bitrise pipeline compiled versions of the app for iOS and Android with minimal effort. With so many teams to keep in sync, we moved to one-week sprints with planning every Monday, and the app got new features and fixes every week.

How long these projects took

For anyone planning a similar project, here is what each one took:

ProjectWhat we didTeamDuration
NaranjaDesign system, CMS and web platform5 people32 sprints
Grupo PetersenOne design system for four banks9 people8 months
RipioProduct discovery and design3 people6 months
FpayMobile app development5 people9 months
SuraApp and responsive web redesign3 people5 months

What carries across

A few rules held up in every one of these projects:

  • Treat speed as part of the product. People read a slow screen as a risky one.
  • Give business teams ownership of their content, with a design system and a CMS they can use without developers.
  • Find the moment of doubt in each flow, like a first crypto purchase, an identity check or a car accident, and design for that moment first.
  • Set engineering guardrails at kickoff: test coverage, a delivery pipeline and a sprint rhythm. They cost less then than after the first incident.

Questions, answered

How long does it take to redesign a banking or fintech product?
In our projects it ranged from five months for Sura's app and web redesign to eight months for Grupo Petersen's design system across four banks. Naranja's platform took 32 sprints from kickoff to delivery.
Can one design system serve several banks?
Yes. For Grupo Petersen we built one design system and one Contentful setup for Banco Santa Fe, Banco Entre Ríos, Banco San Juan and Banco Santa Cruz, with components that cover every product and let teams create new pages without technical knowledge.
How do you make crypto onboarding less intimidating?
At Ripio we reworked onboarding and offboarding for people without technical knowledge, rebuilt navigation for users with and without an account, and improved the KYC flow together with the business requirements, which increased its conversion rate.
About the author

Nicolas Andronowicz

COO, Aerolab

Nico is Aerolab's COO. He has spent years on the new business and delivery side of the studio, helping client teams plan and build digital products.

LinkedIn ↗
Projects in this note

Industry notes · Fintech · Banking · Insurance · Crypto · Design systems · CMS · Onboarding · Web performance · Mobile apps

More Field Notes